The Molecular Physics of Steak Cooking: Heat, Proteins, Water, and the Physics of Doneness
Updated: Aug 21
Dr. Clara E. Moretti¹, Dr. James H. Tanaka², Prof. Lucien B. Fournier³
¹ Department of Food Biophysics, European Institute of Molecular Gastronomy
² Center for Thermal and Soft-Matter Science, Pacific Culinary Science Universityn
³ Laboratory of Protein Physics and Food Materials, Institut des Sciences Alimentaires
[Disclaimer: This is a sample academic article. All author names, affiliations, and institutional details are fictional and have been created solely for illustrative and educational purposes.]
Abstract
Cooking a steak represents a coupled transport and molecular-transformation problem in which heat diffusion, protein denaturation, water migration, collagen restructuring, lipid melting, evaporation, and surface chemistry occur simultaneously across steep spatial and temporal gradients. As thermal energy penetrates from the exterior toward the center, muscle proteins undergo temperature-dependent conformational changes that modify tissue structure, mechanical stiffness, water-holding capacity, and optical appearance. Myofibrillar proteins such as myosin and actin are progressively denatured over different temperature ranges, while connective-tissue collagen can shrink and, during sufficiently prolonged heating, undergo conversion toward gelatin-like structures. Water is redistributed as protein networks contract and intracellular structures lose their original capacity to retain fluid, causing internal pressure gradients, evaporation, and moisture loss that strongly influence perceived juiciness. At the steak surface, temperatures can rise substantially above the boiling point of water after sufficient dehydration has occurred, allowing Maillard chemistry and other thermal reactions to generate the characteristic brown crust, aroma compounds, and complex flavor profile associated with searing. The resulting food structure is therefore highly nonuniform: a single cooked steak can simultaneously contain a dehydrated reaction-rich crust, intermediate zones of extensively denatured protein, and a comparatively hydrated interior whose molecular state reflects its maximum temperature and heating history. This article examines steak cooking as a multiscale physical process involving transient heat conduction, phase and conformational transitions, diffusion, evaporation, protein mechanics, capillary transport, and reaction kinetics. Particular attention is given to temperature gradients, protein denaturation, collagen and fat behavior, moisture migration, the Maillard reaction, crust formation, resting, carry-over cooking, and the influence of steak thickness and cooking rate. The molecular physics of steak cooking demonstrates that “doneness” is not determined by temperature alone but emerges from the complete time–temperature–transport history of the meat, providing a useful everyday example of how molecular transformations, nonequilibrium thermodynamics, and heat transfer combine to produce macroscopic texture, flavor, and juiciness.
1. Introduction
Cooking a steak can be described as a transient, spatially nonuniform transformation of biological soft matter in which thermal energy is transported from the surface toward the interior while proteins denature, muscle fibres contract, water changes mobility and location, connective tissue reorganizes, lipids undergo melting and chemical degradation, and thermally activated reactions generate new aroma and color compounds. Differential-scanning-calorimetry studies of post-rigor muscle have shown that major muscle proteins denature over distinct but overlapping temperature ranges rather than through a single universal “cooking temperature,” meaning that the molecular structure of meat evolves continuously as heating proceeds [10.1002/jsfa.2740311010; 10.1111/j.1745-4603.1982.tb00885.x]. Simultaneous NMR and calorimetric measurements have further demonstrated that protein denaturation is coupled directly to changes in water mobility, providing a molecular explanation for the progressive loss of fluid and juiciness during heating [10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.020]. The final steak is therefore fundamentally heterogeneous: the center, intermediate layers, and surface have experienced different maximum temperatures, heating rates, evaporation histories, and chemical reaction environments, even when they belong to the same piece of meat [10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.061]. Doneness should consequently be viewed not as a single temperature-controlled state but as the outcome of a coupled time–temperature–transport–reaction history through which the original muscle structure is transformed into a new material with spatially varying mechanical, optical, and sensory properties [10.1111/1541-4337.12243].
2. Results and Discussion
The macroscopic properties associated with steak quality—tenderness, juiciness, crust formation, color, aroma, and perceived doneness—emerge from molecular events occurring at different rates and in different spatial regions, so no single variable can describe the complete cooking process. Three-dimensional heat-transfer models of beef have demonstrated that internal temperature gradients can be combined with kinetic descriptions of moisture loss to predict spatially and temporally varying changes during cooking [10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.061]. The central physical problem is therefore multiscale: thermal diffusion determines when particular locations reach molecular-transition temperatures, protein and connective-tissue transformations determine mechanical contraction and fluid expulsion, and surface dehydration determines when high-temperature chemical reactions can proceed efficiently [10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.010; 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4].
2.1. Heat Does Not Enter a Steak Uniformly
When a steak is exposed to a hot pan, grill, oven, or other thermal environment, heat first enters the exterior and subsequently propagates toward the cooler center predominantly through conduction, producing a continuously evolving temperature field rather than instantaneous uniform heating. The characteristic heating time increases strongly with thickness because thermal diffusion must transport energy over a larger distance, while the heating rate experienced by each internal region depends on surface temperature, geometry, thermal properties, boundary conditions, and heat-transfer coefficient [10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.061]. The outer layers can therefore undergo extensive protein denaturation and water loss while the core remains substantially cooler, producing the familiar gradient from crust through increasingly cooked intermediate zones toward the central region [10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.010]. Differences in heating rate are also significant because molecular transformations are kinetic rather than purely temperature-defined, so two steaks reaching the same final center temperature through different thermal trajectories need not possess identical internal structures or sensory properties [10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.032]. Steak thickness and cooking intensity consequently determine not only how long cooking requires but how much of the meat occupies each thermally transformed zone.
2.2. Myosin Denaturation Begins the Structural Transformation
Myosin is one of the first major myofibrillar proteins to undergo extensive structural change during meat heating, with classical calorimetric and sensory studies associating major myosin denaturation with approximately the 40–60 °C region depending on muscle composition, pH, ionic conditions, and heating rate [10.1002/jsfa.2740311010; 10.1111/j.1745-4603.1982.tb00885.x]. As myosin unfolds and aggregates, the geometry and mechanical properties of the myofibrillar lattice are altered, and transverse contraction of muscle fibres becomes prominent, contributing to increasing firmness and fluid displacement [10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.010]. NMR measurements have shown that important changes in water characteristics already become detectable in the 40–50 °C region and are associated with early myosin structural changes, illustrating that protein denaturation and moisture behavior are physically coupled [10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.020]. A steak heated through this regime is therefore not simply becoming “warmer”; its principal contractile protein network is being irreversibly reorganized into a new aggregated material whose water-binding and mechanical properties differ from those of raw muscle [10.1111/1541-4337.12243].
2.3. Actin Denaturation and the Sharp Loss of Juiciness at Higher Temperature
Actin is generally more thermally stable than myosin and undergoes major denaturation at higher temperatures, although the exact transition depends on the experimental system and heating history [10.1002/jsfa.2740311010; 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.020]. Classical beef measurements associated actin denaturation in approximately the upper-60 to low-70 °C range with substantial increases in firmness and decreases in sensory juiciness [10.1111/j.1745-4603.1982.tb00885.x]. Structural investigations have shown that transverse shrinkage dominates over approximately 50–65 °C, whereas marked longitudinal shrinkage becomes more important around 70–75 °C, changes attributed principally to myosin- and actin-associated transformations, respectively [10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.010]. This second stage of myofibrillar contraction can force additional fluid from the fibre network and helps explain why the sensory difference between moderately heated and strongly heated beef can become disproportionately large even when the numerical temperature difference appears relatively modest [10.3390/foods9091289]. The molecular physics of “overcooking” is therefore strongly connected to the transition of the contractile protein network into increasingly contracted and less water-retentive states.
2.4. Water Is Confined by Structure Rather Than Simply Stored Inside the Steak
Most of the water in muscle is not chemically bound in the strong sense of a covalent or permanent molecular attachment but is physically retained within and between myofibrils, protein filaments, cells, and extracellular structures, making water distribution highly sensitive to thermally induced structural changes. NMR relaxometry has directly shown that heating modifies distinct water populations in meat as protein denaturation proceeds, linking changes in molecular mobility to transformations of myosin and actin [10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.020]. Microscopic and macroscopic studies of beef have further demonstrated that muscle fibres and myofibrils contract during heating, reducing the space available for retained fluid and creating pathways through which water and dissolved material can be expelled [10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.010]. Cooking loss consequently increases with temperature and depends strongly on muscle type, ageing, pH, salt, heating method, and the underlying structural state of the meat rather than being determined by evaporation alone [10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108270]. Juiciness is thus best interpreted as an emergent consequence of protein structure, fluid mobility, mechanical contraction, fat, and oral release rather than merely the percentage of water initially present in raw steak.
2.5. Collagen Creates a Competing Tenderness Mechanism
Intramuscular connective tissue contains collagen that contributes substantially to the mechanical resistance of many raw and lightly cooked muscles, but collagen undergoes temperature- and time-dependent denaturation during heating [10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.026]. Differential-scanning-calorimetry measurements often place major collagen transitions approximately in the 60–70 °C region under relatively rapid heating, while prolonged low-temperature cooking can induce important structural changes at lower temperatures because collagen denaturation is a kinetic, multistep, nonequilibrium process [10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.026]. This creates an important competition during cooking: increasing temperature tends to toughen the myofibrillar component through protein contraction while simultaneously weakening or solubilizing portions of the connective tissue [10.1111/j.1745-4603.1982.tb00885.x; 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.026]. Tough connective-tissue-rich cuts can consequently become more tender through prolonged heating even while their muscle fibres undergo substantial denaturation, whereas naturally tender steak muscles may lose desirable juiciness and softness if exposed unnecessarily to high temperatures for long periods [10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.032]. Tenderness is therefore not governed by a single molecular transition but by competition among myofibrillar contraction, connective-tissue breakdown, proteolysis, sarcomere structure, and fluid loss.
2.6. Time Can Substitute Partly for Temperature
The kinetics of protein and connective-tissue transformations explain why cooking time cannot be separated from cooking temperature. Low-temperature long-time cooking in approximately the 50–65 °C range has been shown to produce different combinations of protein denaturation, collagen modification, enzyme activity, moisture retention, and tenderness compared with rapid high-temperature heating [10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.032]. Experiments using beef muscles cooked sous-vide have demonstrated that both temperature and exposure time influence shear force, cooking loss, water-holding capacity, and collagen solubility, with connective-tissue-rich muscles often requiring substantially longer thermal exposure to achieve desirable tenderization [10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108435]. Multi-stage sous-vide protocols have additionally shown that manipulation of the thermal pathway can modify tenderness by exploiting residual proteolytic activity and connective-tissue changes before higher-temperature stages are reached [10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.11.008]. The same final temperature can therefore correspond to different material states depending on whether it was reached rapidly or maintained for hours, demonstrating that a steak possesses a form of thermal history dependence analogous to other nonequilibrium materials.
2.7. Why the Surface Behaves Differently from the Interior
The steak surface experiences a fundamentally different physical environment from the interior because direct contact with a hot cooking surface or high-temperature gas supplies heat rapidly while water can escape into the surroundings. During the early stages of searing, evaporation consumes substantial energy and limits surface-temperature rise, but progressive dehydration eventually allows portions of the surface to reach temperatures at which thermally activated browning and aroma-generating reactions proceed much more rapidly [10.1002/s12393-016-9143-5]. The interior remains water-rich and comparatively cool, so the same reaction pathways occur much less extensively there, producing a chemical stratification between the browned crust and the interior meat [10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4]. The crust should therefore be viewed as a distinct reaction zone generated by coupled heat transfer and mass transfer: water must first be removed sufficiently rapidly for high surface temperatures to be sustained, after which amino compounds, reducing sugars, lipids, peptides, and other precursors undergo extensive chemical conversion [10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111385]. High-temperature searing consequently changes not only appearance but the molecular composition of the outermost layers.
2.8. The Maillard Reaction Creates Much of the Characteristic Cooked Aroma
Raw meat possesses a comparatively limited aroma profile, whereas heating generates hundreds of volatile compounds through Maillard chemistry, lipid degradation, Strecker reactions, thiamine degradation, and interactions among these pathways [10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4; 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111385]. The Maillard reaction begins through reactions between carbonyl groups of reducing sugars and amino groups derived from amino acids, peptides, or proteins and subsequently develops through a complex network of rearrangements, fragmentations, condensations, and heterocycle-forming reactions [10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4]. Sulfur- and nitrogen-containing heterocyclic products are particularly important contributors to roasted and meaty aroma, while lipid oxidation generates aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, and other compounds that contribute both general and species-specific flavor characteristics [10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111385]. High-heat cooking generally favors stronger Maillard-derived roasted notes, while lower-temperature approaches generate a different balance between lipid-derived and Maillard-derived aroma compounds [10.1002/jsfa.7204]. The familiar sensory contrast between a deeply seared crust and an unbrowned interior is therefore a direct macroscopic manifestation of spatially different molecular reaction networks.
2.9. Browning Is Not the Same as Carbonization
A desirable crust represents a controlled region of intense but incomplete thermal chemistry rather than unrestricted pyrolysis. Maillard-derived compounds and lipid-reaction products contribute desirable roasted aromas, but continued exposure to increasingly severe thermal conditions produces additional oxidation, dehydration, polymerization, and decomposition products that progressively shift flavor from roasted toward bitter or burnt characteristics [10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4]. Cooking-induced protein chemistry also includes oxidation, carbonyl formation, amino-acid modifications, cross-linking, and Maillard-derived modifications whose abundance increases with processing intensity [10.1111/1541-4337.12243]. The optimum crust is therefore an intrinsically nonequilibrium product: enough heat must be delivered to accelerate flavor-forming reactions after surface dehydration, but heat exposure must be terminated before excessive degradation overwhelms desirable aroma chemistry. Searing can accordingly be understood as control of a moving chemical boundary between evaporation-dominated heating, productive browning chemistry, and eventual thermal decomposition.
2.10. Fat Is Both a Thermal Component and a Flavor Reservoir
Intramuscular and intermuscular lipids contribute to steak cooking through both physical and chemical mechanisms because increasing temperature softens or melts fat phases, modifies lubrication and mouthfeel, and accelerates thermal and oxidative reactions of fatty acids. Lipid degradation is one of the two principal chemical origins of cooked-meat aroma together with the Maillard reaction, producing aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, hydrocarbons, and related volatiles whose distributions depend on fatty-acid composition and cooking conditions [10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4; 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111385]. Reactions between lipid-derived carbonyl compounds and Maillard intermediates further alter the final aroma mixture, demonstrating that flavor pathways cannot be treated independently [10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4]. The sensory role of marbling is consequently not reducible to “fat melting into the meat”; fat alters lubrication, heat transfer locally, aroma release, and the chemical precursor pool from which cooked flavor develops [10.1002/jsfa.7204]. The molecular contribution of fat is thus simultaneously mechanical, thermophysical, and chemical.
2.11. Color Is a Molecular Signal, but Not a Perfect Thermometer
The red appearance of raw beef is dominated by myoglobin and its different chemical states, while heating denatures the globin structure and changes the optical properties of the pigment system, progressively producing the characteristic brown-gray appearance of cooked meat [10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.006]. Experiments with different myoglobin redox forms have shown that beef samples heated to the same endpoint temperature can display different internal colors because deoxymyoglobin, oxymyoglobin, and metmyoglobin differ in thermal stability [10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15925.x]. Meat pH, oxygen exposure, packaging history, muscle type, redox state, and other factors further modify myoglobin denaturation and cooked color, meaning that visual redness cannot provide a unique measurement of either molecular denaturation state or microbiological safety [10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.006]. The familiar classifications rare, medium, and well-done therefore correlate only imperfectly with molecular state because apparent color reflects pigment chemistry superimposed on the underlying temperature history.
2.12. Steak Texture Emerges from Competing Molecular Processes
The mechanical response of cooked steak reflects the combined effects of myofibrillar protein denaturation, muscle-fibre contraction, collagen behavior, sarcomere length, ageing-dependent proteolysis, water loss, and temperature history. Classical sensory experiments found increased firmness during myosin and actin denaturation but reduced fibre cohesiveness when collagen denatured, demonstrating that different structural components can affect tenderness in opposite directions over overlapping temperature ranges [10.1111/j.1745-4603.1982.tb00885.x]. More recent experiments have confirmed that beef muscle type, ageing state, and cooking temperature interact strongly in determining shear force, shrinkage, and cooking loss [10.3390/foods9091289]. Connective tissue dominates the mechanical contribution in some raw and lightly cooked muscles, whereas at higher cooking temperatures the myofibrillar component may become increasingly important [10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.026]. There is consequently no universal temperature at which all steaks become maximally tender, because the balance between fibre toughening and connective-tissue weakening depends on the anatomical cut and its initial microstructure.
2.13. Carry-Over Cooking Is an Internal Heat-Redistribution Problem
Removing a steak from a pan does not instantly eliminate its internal temperature gradients because the outer layers are still warmer than the center, so thermal energy continues to diffuse inward while the exterior begins losing energy to the surroundings. The core temperature can therefore continue rising temporarily after external heating has stopped, a phenomenon commonly termed carry-over cooking and predicted directly by transient heat-conduction physics [10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.061]. The magnitude of this continued heating depends on steak thickness, surface temperature, previous heating rate, geometry, and thermal boundary conditions rather than on a universal fixed temperature increment. During this period, protein denaturation and fluid migration can continue wherever local temperatures remain high enough for the relevant kinetic processes [10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.010]. The appropriate endpoint of active cooking must therefore be understood in relation to the subsequent thermal trajectory rather than solely to the instant at which the steak leaves the heat source.
2.14. Resting and the Question of Juice Redistribution
Resting cooked meat has traditionally been explained as allowing expelled fluid to become “reabsorbed,” but the underlying physics is more complicated because temperature gradients, fluid pressure, protein contraction, cooling, and water mobility evolve simultaneously after heating ends. A recent controlled study of beef roasts found that resting for 8 or 13 minutes reduced fluid released during subsequent slicing but increased fluid lost during the resting period itself, while total moisture loss and sensory juiciness were not significantly different among rested and unrested treatments [10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109864]. These results indicate that resting can redistribute when and where fluid is lost without necessarily increasing the total amount of water ultimately retained in the meat [10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109864]. At the same time, thermal equilibration during resting remains important because the center may continue to warm while the exterior cools, changing the final spatial distribution of protein denaturation [10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.061]. Resting should therefore be understood primarily as a coupled thermal and fluid-relaxation stage rather than through the simplified picture of juices leaving muscle fibres and subsequently being drawn back into them.
2.15. Why Two Steaks at the Same Center Temperature Can Taste Different
Center temperature is experimentally convenient but compresses an entire three-dimensional thermal history into a single number, so steaks with identical final core temperatures can nevertheless possess very different gradients, crust thicknesses, moisture losses, aroma profiles, and mechanical structures. A thin steak exposed to intense surface heat can reach its target center temperature rapidly while producing a large fraction of highly heated tissue, whereas a thicker steak or low-temperature process can generate a fundamentally different spatial distribution of protein states despite eventually reaching the same center temperature [10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.061]. Cooking rate has long been shown to influence cooking loss and structural behavior in beef, while modern low-temperature studies demonstrate that time–temperature combinations strongly alter tenderness and water retention [10.1002/jsfa.2740251109; 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.032]. Doneness is therefore better represented as a field of local material states (S(\mathbf{r},t)) determined by the complete thermal trajectory (T(\mathbf{r},t)) than as a single thermometer reading. The steak on the plate is effectively a frozen record of how heat traveled through it.
3. Conclusion and Outlook
Steak cooking provides an unusually accessible example of nonequilibrium materials physics because macroscopic sensory properties emerge from interacting molecular transformations that occur across spatially varying temperature and moisture fields. Heat conduction establishes the thermal gradients through which individual regions encounter protein-transition temperatures at different times, myosin and actin denaturation reorganize the myofibrillar structure and progressively alter firmness and water retention, collagen undergoes slower time-dependent transformations that can reduce connective-tissue toughness, and surface dehydration enables Maillard and lipid-derived reaction networks to produce the characteristic aroma and crust of cooked beef. Myoglobin transformations generate the visual progression associated with doneness, although cooked color remains an imperfect indicator of thermal state, while carry-over heating and post-cooking equilibration demonstrate that molecular transformations can continue even after external heating has ceased. The most complete physical description is therefore heat input → transient temperature field → protein and connective-tissue transitions → structural contraction and water migration → surface dehydration → reaction chemistry → final texture, color, aroma, and juiciness. Future studies combining magnetic-resonance imaging, infrared thermography, spectroscopy, microscopy, computational heat and mass transfer, and molecular-scale protein analysis could increasingly transform cooking from an empirical process into a quantitatively predictable example of multiscale soft-matter engineering.
References
Stabursvik, E., & Martens, H. (1980). Thermal denaturation of proteins in post rigor muscle tissue as studied by differential scanning calorimetry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 31, 1034–1042. [10.1002/jsfa.2740311010]
Martens, H., Stabursvik, E., & Martens, M. (1982). Texture and colour changes in meat during cooking related to thermal denaturation of muscle proteins. Journal of Texture Studies, 13, 291–309. [10.1111/j.1745-4603.1982.tb00885.x]
Locker, R. H., & Daines, G. J. (1974). Cooking loss in beef: The effect of cold shortening, searing and rate of heating; time course and histology of changes during cooking. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 25. [10.1002/jsfa.2740251109]
Mottram, D. S. (1998). Flavour formation in meat and meat products: A review. Food Chemistry, 62, 415–424. [10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4]
Hunt, M. C., Sørheim, O., & Slinde, E. (1999). Color and heat denaturation of myoglobin forms in ground beef. Journal of Food Science, 64, 847–851. [10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15925.x]
Bertram, H. C., Wu, Z., van den Berg, F., & Andersen, H. J. (2006). NMR relaxometry and differential scanning calorimetry during meat cooking. Meat Science, 74, 684–689. [10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.020]
Kondjoyan, A., Oillic, S., Portanguen, S., & Gros, J.-B. (2013). Combined heat transfer and kinetic models to predict cooking loss during heat treatment of beef meat. Meat Science, 95, 336–344. [10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.061]
Kerth, C. R., & Miller, R. K. (2015). Beef flavor: A review from chemistry to consumer. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95, 2783–2798. [10.1002/jsfa.7204]
Purslow, P. P., Oiseth, S., Hughes, J., & Warner, R. D. (2016). The structural basis of cooking loss in beef: Variations with temperature and ageing. Food Research International, 89, 739–748. [10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.010]
Suman, S. P., Nair, M. N., Joseph, P., & Hunt, M. C. (2016). Factors influencing internal color of cooked meats. Meat Science, 120, 133–144. [10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.006]
Yu, T.-Y., Morton, J. D., Clerens, S., & Dyer, J. M. (2017). Cooking-induced protein modifications in meat. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 16, 141–159. [10.1111/1541-4337.12243]
Purslow, P. P. (2018). Contribution of collagen and connective tissue to cooked meat toughness: Some paradigms reviewed. Meat Science, 144, 127–134. [10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.026]
Dominguez-Hernandez, E., Salaseviciene, A., & Ertbjerg, P. (2018). Low-temperature long-time cooking of meat: Eating quality and underlying mechanisms. Meat Science, 143, 104–113. [10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.032]
Uttaro, B., Zawadski, S., & McLeod, B. (2019). Efficacy of multi-stage sous-vide cooking on tenderness of low value beef muscles. Meat Science, 149, 40–46. [10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.11.008]
Vaskoska, R., Ha, M., Naqvi, Z. B., White, J. D., & Warner, R. D. (2020). Muscle, ageing and temperature influence the changes in texture, cooking loss and shrinkage of cooked beef. Foods, 9, 1289. [10.3390/foods9091289]
Macharáčková, B., Bogdanovičová, K., Ježek, F., Bednář, J., Haruštiaková, D., & Kameník, J. (2021). Cooking loss in retail beef cuts: The effect of muscle type, sex, ageing, pH, salt and cooking method. Meat Science, 171, 108270. [10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108270]
Naqvi, Z. B., Thomson, P. C., Ha, M., Campbell, M. A., McGill, D. M., Friend, M. A., & Warner, R. D. (2021). Effect of sous vide cooking and ageing on tenderness and water-holding capacity of low-value beef muscles from young and older animals. Meat Science, 175, 108435. [10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108435]
Sohail, A., Al-Dalali, S., Wang, J., Xie, J., Shakoor, A., Asimi, S., Shah, H., & Patil, P. (2022). Aroma compounds identified in cooked meat: A review. Food Research International, 157, 111385. [10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111385]
Prieto, N., Zawadski, S., Schmidt, B., & Lopez-Campos, O. (2025). Effect of resting time on beef roast moisture retention and palatability. Meat Science, 227, 109864. [10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109864]
Comments