Nano Art: When Nanotechnology Becomes an Artistic Medium
Updated: Aug 22
Dr. Sofia L. Moreau¹, Dr. Adrian K. Velasquez², Prof. Haruka Nishimori³
¹ Department of Nanophotonics and Visual Culture, European Institute for Art and Science
² Center for Functional Nanomaterials and Design, Pacific Institute of Technology
³ Laboratory for Optical Nanomaterials, Advanced Science Institute
[Disclaimer: This is a sample academic article. All author names, affiliations, and institutional details are fictional and have been created solely for illustrative and educational purposes.]
Abstract
Nano Art occupies an unusual boundary between materials science, optics, microscopy, fabrication, and artistic practice, using structures with dimensions from several nanometres to hundreds of nanometres to create visual effects that cannot be understood solely through conventional pigments or macroscopic surface design. At these dimensions, optical behavior can become strongly dependent on particle size, shape, composition, spacing, surrounding refractive index, and electronic structure. Metallic nanoparticles can support localized surface-plasmon resonances that produce intense absorption and scattering colors, while semiconductor quantum dots exhibit size-dependent electronic confinement that allows their absorption and photoluminescence spectra to be tuned through nanoscale synthesis. Periodic and quasi-periodic nanostructures can additionally generate structural color through interference, diffraction, resonant scattering, and metasurface effects, making coloration possible without conventional molecular dyes. These principles connect contemporary nanotechnology with much older artistic materials: metallic nanoparticles were unknowingly exploited in historical glass and ceramics long before their nanoscale origin was understood scientifically. Modern fabrication techniques—including electron-beam lithography, focused-ion-beam processing, nanoimprinting, self-assembly, colloidal synthesis, thin-film deposition, and high-resolution microscopy—now permit optical appearance to be engineered intentionally from structures that may themselves be far below the resolving power of the unaided human eye. Nano Art can consequently operate on two visual scales: microscopic or nanoscale structures may constitute the artwork itself when revealed by electron or scanning-probe microscopy, while ensembles of nanostructures can generate macroscopic color, reflection, iridescence, fluorescence, or dynamically changing optical responses visible directly to an observer. Stimuli-responsive nanoparticles, liquid crystals, plasmonic structures, electrochromic materials, and mechanically reconfigurable nanostructures further create opportunities for artworks whose appearance varies with illumination, viewing angle, temperature, electric field, chemical environment, or mechanical deformation. However, the frequently repeated statement that “smaller nanoparticles are blue and larger nanoparticles are red” is not a universal law: such size-dependent spectral shifts are strongly material- and mechanism-dependent and are particularly characteristic of semiconductor quantum dots, whereas plasmonic nanoparticle color depends additionally on geometry, aggregation, dielectric environment, and electromagnetic coupling. Particular attention is therefore given to nanoscale color generation, quantum confinement, plasmonics, structural color, photoluminescence, microscopy as an artistic instrument, responsive nanomaterials, fabrication strategies, conservation challenges, and the environmental and safety implications of incorporating engineered nanoparticles into cultural objects. Nano Art is thus best understood not simply as art made “very small,” but as a new design regime in which nanoscale structure → electronic and optical response → controlled interaction with light → macroscopic visual experience, allowing artistic expression to emerge directly from the physics of matter at the nanoscale.
1. Introduction
Nano Art describes a broad and still evolving intersection between artistic practice and the scientific ability to visualize, manipulate, fabricate, or exploit matter at nanometre dimensions. The term does not refer to a single standardized artistic technique: it can include images derived from electron or scanning-probe microscopy, deliberately fabricated nanoscale structures, macroscopic artworks whose optical appearance originates from nanomaterials, and conceptual works concerned with the cultural implications of nanotechnology [10.17057/kahoma.2014..36.008; 10.1093/nsr/nwaf468]. The development of scanning tunnelling microscopy and atomic-force microscopy fundamentally altered this relationship by making surfaces accessible at atomic and molecular resolution, while demonstrations of individual-atom manipulation showed that nanoscale matter could be deliberately positioned rather than merely observed [10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930; 10.1038/344524a0]. At the same time, modern nanomaterials introduced optical properties unavailable to conventional pigments: semiconductor nanocrystals exhibit size-dependent quantum confinement, noble-metal nanoparticles support localized surface-plasmon resonances, carbon-nanotube forests can approach near-perfect broadband absorption, and ordered nanoscale architectures can generate structural colors through interference and resonant scattering [10.1063/1.447218; 10.1016/j.aca.2011.08.020; 10.1063/1.5009190; 10.1088/0034-4885/71/7/076401]. Nano Art therefore extends artistic control beyond composition and pigment chemistry toward direct engineering of the interaction between matter and electromagnetic radiation.
2. Results and Discussion
The scientific foundation of Nano Art can be organized around three distinct operations: seeing the nanoscale, building at the nanoscale, and using nanoscale structure to control macroscopic perception. These categories should not be conflated because an electron-microscope image of a nanostructure, an atomically fabricated pattern, and a centimetre-scale object containing plasmonic nanoparticles may all reasonably be discussed as Nano Art while relying on fundamentally different technologies [10.1093/nsr/nwaf468]. The unifying element is that nanoscale information or nanoscale material organization is essential to the generation, interpretation, or visual behavior of the work.
2.1. What Counts as Nano Art?
Nano Art is best treated as an interdisciplinary category rather than as a rigorously bounded scientific field because artistic works can engage nanotechnology at different levels. In one approach, microscopic structures produced for scientific purposes are transformed into aesthetic images using scanning electron microscopy, atomic-force microscopy, or related visualization methods; in another, artists or scientists deliberately fabricate structures whose physical dimensions themselves constitute the work; and in a third, nanomaterials are incorporated into macroscopic objects so that quantum, plasmonic, or structural optical properties determine what the observer sees [10.17057/kahoma.2014..36.008; 10.1093/nsr/nwaf468]. A work inspired by nanotechnology but containing no nanoscale imaging, fabrication, material, or nanoscale-dependent phenomenon may be scientifically inspired art without necessarily being Nano Art in the stronger material sense. This distinction matters because the scientific novelty lies not merely in adopting nanoscale terminology but in making nanoscale physics or instrumentation causally important to the resulting visual experience.
2.2. Nano Art Has Precursors Thousands of Years Older Than Nanotechnology
Humans exploited nanoscale optical phenomena long before the existence of either nanoscience or a theoretical understanding of nanoparticles. The fourth-century Roman Lycurgus Cup provides a striking example: the glass appears predominantly green in reflected illumination but red when light is transmitted through it because metallic gold–silver nanoparticles embedded in the glass interact differently with incident light [10.1007/BF03215599]. Modern analyses have shown that this dichroism originates from the nanoscale metallic inclusions rather than from an ordinary molecular pigment, making the object a remarkable historical demonstration of plasmonic coloration produced centuries before nanoparticles could be imaged directly [10.1007/BF03215599]. Contemporary researchers have even reproduced related dichroic effects in printable polymer nanocomposites containing silver and gold nanoparticles, demonstrating how an ancient visual phenomenon can be reconstructed through modern nanomaterials engineering [10.3762/bjnano.11.2]. The history of Nano Art can therefore be interpreted in two phases: accidental or empirical exploitation of nanoscale phenomena followed by deliberate scientific design once the responsible structures became measurable and controllable.
2.3. Seeing the Invisible: Microscopy as an Artistic Interface
A central conceptual problem in Nano Art is that a nanometre-scale object cannot generally be “seen” directly in the ordinary optical sense because structures substantially smaller than visible wavelengths cannot be resolved using conventional light microscopy. Scanning tunnelling microscopy instead reconstructs surface structure from the tunnelling current between a conductive probe and a sample, allowing atomic-scale topography to be mapped [10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.57], while atomic-force microscopy measures forces between a nanoscale probe and a surface and can therefore image conducting and nonconducting materials [10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930]. Electron microscopy similarly creates images from electron–matter interactions rather than visible photons. Consequently, many Nano Art images are not conventional photographs but mathematically reconstructed maps of height, current, electron scattering, or another measured interaction [10.17057/kahoma.2014..36.008]. Their colors are also frequently assigned during visualization rather than representing intrinsic optical color at the nanoscale. Nano Art therefore raises an unusual aesthetic question: the image may be physically faithful to measured nanoscale structure while its visual appearance is necessarily mediated by an instrument and computational representation.
2.4. Atom Manipulation Turned Imaging into Fabrication
The transition from observing atoms to deliberately arranging them represents one of the most iconic milestones connecting nanoscience with visual culture. Eigler and Schweizer demonstrated positioning of individual xenon atoms using a scanning tunnelling microscope, arranging atoms into deliberately selected configurations and showing that atomic-scale structures could be constructed one atom at a time [10.1038/344524a0]. Such experiments were primarily demonstrations of nanoscale manipulation rather than conventional artworks, but their visual impact helped establish the idea that the atomic world could become a designed spatial medium [10.1093/nsr/nwaf468]. The important scientific distinction is that the atoms are not moved by miniature mechanical fingers; the STM tip modifies the local interaction potential and can induce controlled atomic displacement across a cryogenic surface. At this scale, fabrication and imaging become closely coupled because the same probe can manipulate a structure and subsequently verify its configuration.
2.5. Nanoparticles Do More Than Provide a Large Surface Area
Nanoparticles are often introduced through the statement that they have a large surface-area-to-volume ratio, which is important for catalysis, adsorption, chemical reactivity, and interfacial behavior, but their artistic optical potential cannot be explained by surface area alone. When particle dimensions become comparable to relevant electronic or electromagnetic length scales, the electronic states and optical resonances can differ substantially from those of bulk matter. Semiconductor nanoparticles can exhibit quantum confinement, metallic nanoparticles can support collective free-electron oscillations, and periodic nanoparticle assemblies can interfere selectively with particular wavelengths of light [10.1063/1.447218; 10.1016/j.aca.2011.08.020; 10.1088/0034-4885/71/7/076401]. Nano Art based on functional optical nanomaterials therefore relies on nanoscale electronic structure and electromagnetic boundary conditions rather than simply on the fact that small particles expose more surface.
2.6. Plasmonic Color: When Metal Becomes a Palette
Gold and silver are familiar as reflective metallic materials at macroscopic scales, yet sufficiently small nanoparticles can display intense red, purple, orange, yellow, blue, or other optical responses because incident light excites collective oscillations of conduction electrons known as localized surface-plasmon resonances [10.1016/j.aca.2011.08.020]. The resonance depends strongly on nanoparticle material, geometry, dimensions, surrounding refractive index, and electromagnetic coupling between adjacent particles, so color can be manipulated by nanoscale engineering rather than by changing conventional pigment molecules [10.1016/j.aca.2011.08.020]. Closely spaced particles can interact strongly and generate spectral responses very different from isolated particles, while anisotropic structures such as nanorods possess multiple plasmon modes associated with different directions. A plasmonic artwork can therefore encode its visible palette geometrically: changing structures by tens of nanometres may substantially alter the wavelengths absorbed and scattered.
2.7. “Smaller Is Blue, Larger Is Red” Is Not a Universal Nanoparticle Rule
The frequently repeated statement that smaller nanoparticles produce blue light while larger particles produce red light is scientifically misleading if presented as a general law. In semiconductor quantum dots, decreasing particle size strengthens quantum confinement and generally increases the effective optical energy gap, shifting absorption and emission toward shorter wavelengths, while increasing size shifts spectral features toward longer wavelengths [10.1063/1.447218; 10.1016/S0038-1098(85)80025-9]. Metallic plasmonic particles behave differently: their resonance is controlled not only by size but by shape, dielectric environment, material composition, surface scattering, and interparticle coupling [10.1016/j.aca.2011.08.020]. Aggregating gold nanoparticles, for example, can create strong red shifts even without increasing the physical size of each individual nanoparticle. Artistic control therefore requires identifying the underlying optical mechanism rather than applying a universal size–color rule across fundamentally different nanomaterials.
2.8. Quantum Dots: Color from Quantum Confinement
Semiconductor quantum dots represent one of the most direct examples in which nanometre dimensions determine visible optical properties. When a semiconductor crystallite becomes sufficiently small, confinement of electrons and holes modifies the allowed electronic energy levels, causing the lowest optical transition to depend strongly on particle size [10.1063/1.447218]. Experimental studies of semiconductor microcrystals demonstrated systematic shifts of the absorption edge with decreasing crystal size [10.1016/S0038-1098(85)80025-9], while advances in colloidal synthesis subsequently enabled nearly monodisperse CdS, CdSe, and CdTe nanocrystals whose emission could be tuned through controlled particle growth [10.1021/ja00072a025]. A collection of quantum dots can therefore act as a nanoscale palette whose colors are partly determined by particle dimensions rather than only chemical identity. However, modern artistic or consumer applications must also consider composition, because traditional cadmium-containing quantum dots raise toxicity and environmental concerns that depend on their coatings, stability, degradation, dose, and exposure conditions [10.1289/ehp.8284].
2.9. Photoluminescence Turns Invisible Excitation into Visible Emission
Many semiconductor nanoparticles absorb photons at one wavelength and subsequently emit light at a longer wavelength through photoluminescence, allowing fluorescent colors to be generated under ultraviolet or visible excitation. Quantum dots are especially useful because their broad absorption and comparatively narrow, size-tunable emission bands permit multiple distinct colors to be excited simultaneously [10.1021/ja00072a025]. Their optical behavior can additionally depend on surface passivation, defects, chemical environment, temperature, and interactions with nearby materials, meaning that a nominally identical nanocrystal core can display different luminescence efficiencies depending on its surface chemistry. For artistic applications this opens opportunities for images whose appearance changes dramatically when excitation conditions change, while also creating conservation challenges because photochemical degradation or surface oxidation can alter emission over time.
2.10. Structural Color: Making Color Without Conventional Pigment Molecules
Structural color is generated when microscopic or nanoscale architecture selectively interferes with, diffracts, scatters, or resonantly reflects particular wavelengths of light rather than absorbing light through conventional pigment molecules [10.1088/0034-4885/71/7/076401]. Biological structures provide numerous examples: nanoscale architectures in butterfly scales, beetle cuticle, bird feathers, and other organisms produce intense colors whose appearance can change strongly with viewing direction [10.1038/nature01941]. Synthetic photonic crystals, multilayers, gratings, dielectric nanostructures, and metasurfaces can reproduce and extend these effects. From an artistic perspective, structural color changes the role of the surface from a passive support for pigment into an optical device whose geometry determines color. A blue region and a red region can therefore consist of the same chemical substance but differ in nanoscale periodicity or feature dimensions.
2.11. Printing Images with Nanostructure Instead of Ink
Plasmonic nanostructures have demonstrated that full-color imagery can be encoded at dimensions approaching the diffraction limit of visible light. Arrays of metallic nanodisks with carefully controlled dimensions and spacing have been used to generate color pixels with pitches of approximately hundreds of nanometres, permitting images with effective resolutions approaching (10^5) dots per inch [10.1038/nnano.2012.128]. Unlike ordinary printing, in which different molecular pigments or dyes are deposited to create color, such “structural printing” can generate multiple colors from a common material by altering only nanoscale geometry. The visible image is therefore a macroscopic decoding of an underlying nanostructural pattern. This concept creates obvious artistic possibilities while also intersecting with high-density information storage, anticounterfeiting, security markings, and optical data encoding.
2.12. The Artistic Power of Extreme Black
Nanostructure can also manipulate perception by suppressing rather than generating reflected color. Vertically aligned carbon-nanotube forests exhibit extremely low broadband reflectance because their effective optical structure strongly suppresses reflection while light entering the porous forest undergoes repeated absorption and scattering [10.1063/1.3663873; 10.1063/1.5009190]. Such materials can appear visually unusual because conventional shading cues are drastically reduced, causing three-dimensional surfaces to appear closer to two-dimensional voids under appropriate illumination. The art-world attention surrounding ultrablack coatings, including their association with contemporary artists, should therefore be separated from the underlying materials physics: the remarkable visual effect arises from nanoscale carbon architecture rather than from “black pigment” in the conventional sense [10.1063/1.5009190]. These coatings also illustrate an important practical problem for Nano Art: some extremely high-performance nanoscale surfaces can be mechanically fragile and difficult to transfer, handle, conserve, or expose safely.
2.13. Dynamic Nano Art: A Surface That Changes While It Is Observed
Nanostructured optical systems can be designed so that color responds reversibly to mechanical deformation, temperature, electric fields, solvents, humidity, or other environmental variables, creating a pathway toward genuinely dynamic artworks. Colloidal photonic crystals embedded within elastomers have demonstrated reversible structural-color shifts during stretching because mechanical deformation changes the lattice spacing responsible for optical diffraction [10.1021/la0521037]. More recent photonic materials integrate responsive architectures with mechanically switchable geometries, allowing visible optical patterns to encode deformation directly [10.1002/anie.202103045]. In such systems, the viewer does not merely observe a fixed artistic object; physical interaction can modify nanoscale spacing and thereby rewrite the object's optical response. The artistic medium becomes an active material whose color is coupled directly to its mechanical or environmental state.
2.14. Environmental Conditions Become Part of the Artwork
Because nanoscale optical responses depend strongly on geometry, surface chemistry, refractive index, aggregation, and electronic state, Nano Art can be unusually sensitive to environmental changes. Humidity can swell responsive polymer matrices, temperature can alter photoluminescence or phase behavior, oxidation can modify metallic nanoparticles, mechanical stress can reorganize photonic structures, and contaminants can change the dielectric environment surrounding plasmonic particles [10.1016/j.aca.2011.08.020]. This sensitivity can be deliberately exploited to create responsive works, but it can also produce unwanted aging and make long-term conservation difficult. In conventional painting, conservation science attempts to stabilize pigment and binder chemistry; in Nano Art, preservation may additionally require maintaining nanoscale geometry and interparticle spacing because changes too small to see structurally can nonetheless create obvious macroscopic color changes.
2.15. Nano Art and Cultural-Heritage Conservation Intersect in Both Directions
Nanotechnology is not limited to creating new art; it is increasingly used to preserve existing cultural heritage. Nanoparticles of calcium and magnesium hydroxides, inorganic oxides, hydroxyapatite, and related materials have been investigated for consolidation, deacidification, protection, and restoration of stone, paper, wood, wall paintings, and other heritage substrates [10.1039/B516442G; 10.3390/ma13092064]. Their small dimensions can permit penetration into porous structures and provide reactivity that differs from conventional bulk treatments [10.1039/B516442G]. This creates an unusual conceptual loop in which nanotechnology can simultaneously become an artistic medium and a conservation technology. It also means that future conservation laboratories may need to distinguish original nanomaterials intentionally incorporated by artists from later nanoscale treatments introduced by conservators.
2.16. Safety and Ethics Cannot Be Separated from the Artistic Medium
The novelty of nanomaterials does not make them intrinsically hazardous, but neither should artistic use be assumed safe simply because the quantity of material is small. Particle composition, dimensions, morphology, surface chemistry, solubility, aggregation, route of exposure, persistence, and dose all influence potential health and environmental effects [10.1111/risa.12546]. Cadmium-containing quantum dots provide a clear example in which toxicity can depend strongly on whether toxic constituent ions become biologically available after degradation [10.1289/ehp.8284]. Dry nanopowders and aerosol-generating processes require particular attention because inhalation pathways differ from exposure to nanoparticles immobilized within a stable solid matrix. Responsible Nano Art therefore requires the same hierarchy of engineering controls, containment, material documentation, waste management, and exposure assessment expected in scientific laboratories using equivalent nanomaterials.
2.17. Nano Art Also Challenges the Meaning of Authenticity
Traditional art conservation frequently attempts to preserve the material state intended by the artist, but responsive and nanoscale artworks complicate this concept because their defining property may be controlled change. A structural-color object may shift spectrum as its polymer ages, a quantum-dot work may gradually lose luminescence, a plasmonic surface may oxidize, and a responsive installation may require replacement electronics or active materials to continue functioning. The original artistic object may therefore consist partly of a physical structure and partly of a prescribed optical behavior. Preserving future Nano Art could require storing fabrication parameters, spectroscopy, electron-microscopy images, particle characterization, software, environmental operating conditions, and replacement protocols alongside conventional provenance documentation. Material authenticity may increasingly become inseparable from functional authenticity.
2.18. From Nano Art to Programmable Optical Matter
The longer-term significance of Nano Art may lie in a transition from static nanostructured color toward materials whose optical properties can be programmed and reprogrammed. Tunable structural-color systems already demonstrate electrically and mechanically controlled spectral behavior, while metasurfaces, phase-change materials, liquid crystals, and stimuli-responsive nanocomposites offer progressively more sophisticated control over amplitude, phase, polarization, and wavelength [10.1038/s41377-022-00847-z]. Future artistic surfaces could therefore behave less like conventional paintings and more like physical displays in which nanoscale architecture determines how incoming light is transformed and external signals modify that architecture or its optical response. Such works would blur boundaries among painting, sculpture, display technology, materials science, and interactive installation, making the optical properties of matter itself an artistic language.
3. Conclusion and Outlook
Nano Art represents more than miniaturized imagery because its distinctive possibilities arise when nanoscale matter becomes causally responsible for perception. Historical artifacts such as the Lycurgus Cup demonstrate that metal nanoparticles generated striking optical effects long before their physical origin was understood, while scanning-probe microscopy and atomic manipulation transformed the nanoscale from an inferred scientific domain into an experimentally accessible design space. Semiconductor quantum dots demonstrate how quantum confinement converts particle dimensions into tunable optical spectra, plasmonic structures provide geometric control over metallic coloration, photonic architectures generate pigment-free structural colors, nanoscale patterning permits color printing at extraordinary spatial resolution, and carbon-nanotube forests demonstrate how nanoscale morphology can create surfaces approaching ideal optical blackness. Responsive materials extend these principles further by allowing deformation or environmental stimuli to rewrite visible appearance dynamically. The emerging progression can therefore be expressed as nanoscale observation → nanoscale manipulation → engineered optical response → responsive nanostructure → programmable visual matter. At the same time, the field will require increasingly serious attention to nanomaterial safety, environmental release, aging, reproducibility, and conservation . The most consequential contribution of Nano Art may ultimately be conceptual: it demonstrates that color, darkness, luminosity, texture, and visual form need not be applied only to the surface of matter — they can be engineered into matter through control of its structure at dimensions far below what the human eye can directly resolve.
References
Binnig, G., Rohrer, H., Gerber, C., & Weibel, E. (1982). Surface studies by scanning tunneling microscopy. Physical Review Letters, 49, 57–61. [10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.57]
Binnig, G., Quate, C. F., & Gerber, C. (1986). Atomic force microscope. Physical Review Letters, 56, 930–933. [10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930]
Brus, L. E. (1984). Electron–electron and electron-hole interactions in small semiconductor crystallites: The size dependence of the lowest excited electronic state. Journal of Chemical Physics, 80, 4403–4409. [10.1063/1.447218]
Ekimov, A. I., Efros, A. L., & Onushchenko, A. A. (1985). Quantum size effect in semiconductor microcrystals. Solid State Communications, 56, 921–924. [10.1016/S0038-1098(85)80025-9]
Eigler, D. M., & Schweizer, E. K. (1990). Positioning single atoms with a scanning tunnelling microscope. Nature, 344, 524–526. [10.1038/344524a0]
Murray, C. B., Norris, D. J., & Bawendi, M. G. (1993). Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse CdE semiconductor nanocrystallites. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 115, 8706–8715. [10.1021/ja00072a025]
Vukusic, P., & Sambles, J. R. (2003). Photonic structures in biology. Nature, 424, 852–855. [10.1038/nature01941]
Fudouzi, H., & Xia, Y. (2006). Photonic rubber sheets with tunable color by elastic deformation. Langmuir, 22, 2465–2470. [10.1021/la0521037]
Baglioni, P., & Giorgi, R. (2006). Soft and hard nanomaterials for restoration and conservation of cultural heritage. Soft Matter, 2, 293–303. [10.1039/B516442G]
Hardman, R. (2006). A toxicologic review of quantum dots: Toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 165–172. [10.1289/ehp.8284]
Freestone, I., Meeks, N., Sax, M., & Higgitt, C. (2007). The Lycurgus Cup—A Roman nanotechnology. Gold Bulletin, 40, 270–277. [10.1007/BF03215599]
Kinoshita, S., Yoshioka, S., & Miyazaki, J. (2008). Physics of structural colors. Reports on Progress in Physics, 71, 076401. [10.1088/0034-4885/71/7/076401]
Shi, H., Ok, J. G., Baac, H. W., & Guo, L. J. (2011). Low density carbon nanotube forest as an index-matched and near perfect absorption coating. Applied Physics Letters, 99, 211103. [10.1063/1.3663873]
Petryayeva, E., & Krull, U. J. (2011). Localized surface plasmon resonance: Nanostructures, bioassays and biosensing—A review. Analytica Chimica Acta, 706, 8–24. [10.1016/j.aca.2011.08.020]
Kumar, K., Duan, H., Hegde, R. S., Koh, S. C. W., Wei, J. N., & Yang, J. K. W. (2012). Printing colour at the optical diffraction limit. Nature Nanotechnology, 7, 557–561. [10.1038/nnano.2012.128]
Cheon, H. (2014). Art and nanotechnology: Haptic mimesis of reality. Journal of History of Modern Art, 36, 211–231. [10.17057/kahoma.2014..36.008]
Erbis, S., Ok, Z., Isaacs, J. A., Benneyan, J. C., & Kamarthi, S. (2016). Review of research trends and methods in nano environmental, health, and safety risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 36, 1644–1665. [10.1111/risa.12546]
Lehman, J., Yung, C., Tomlin, N., Conklin, D., & Stephens, M. (2018). Carbon nanotube-based black coatings. Applied Physics Reviews, 5, 011103. [10.1063/1.5009190]
Kool, L., Dekker, F., Bunschoten, A., et al. (2020). Gold and silver dichroic nanocomposite in the quest for 3D printing the Lycurgus cup. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 11, 16–23. [10.3762/bjnano.11.2]
David, M. E., Ion, R.-M., Grigorescu, R. M., Iancu, L., & Andrei, E. R. (2020). Nanomaterials used in conservation and restoration of cultural heritage: An up-to-date overview. Materials, 13, 2064. [10.3390/ma13092064]
Lai, X., et al. (2021). Bioinspired color switchable photonic crystal silicone elastomer kirigami. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 60. [10.1002/anie.202103045]
Tittl, A. (2022). Tunable structural colors on display. Light: Science & Applications, 11, 155. [10.1038/s41377-022-00847-z]
Tian, J., Chen, J., Liu, Y., et al. (2025). Nanotechnology opens up a new universe of nanoart. National Science Review, 12, nwaf468. [10.1093/nsr/nwaf468]
Comments